Annals of the Sorcerous Black Speech
Or:
Nak Malburz-Hagdum
The following annals provide the lexicon, usage notes, and process of derivation for the reconstructed version of the Black Speech, a language whose first known glimpses come from the literature of J.R.R. Tolkein. The name of this reconstructed dialect in particular, in its own tongue, is Malburz-Hagdum, meaning “sorcerous Black Speech”. This is in reference to the explicitly magical properties intended in the structure and nature of the language.
The method of the language’s
construction bases itself in the theory that the original Black Speech was
derived either of Hittite (The
Tongues of Arda - Orkish), Old Norse (A Burzum Story: Part I), or a
combination of the two, visualizing further that the Black Speech is a
derivation of Proto-Indo-European. The relationship between the words in
Tolkein’s canon and certain Proto-Indo-European words provide rules for the
methodology of the lexicon’s construction, which is extrapolated in the section
titled PROCESS.
The purpose of this construction is
to provide a theoretical vision of the Black Speech had its psycho-spiritual
basis been in fact rooted in the Proto-Indo-European language. It would therefore
resonate more strongly than the poorly supplied canon with the psyche of the
“real” world (rather than the pure confines of the Tolkein legendarium), paving
the way for its usage as a magical language in such a context.
Table
of Contents:
LEXICON
Nouns,
Verbs, Grammatical Endings, Selected Vocabulary
PROCESS
Analysis
of the Canon, Supplementation of the Lexicon
NOTES
AND USAGE
Sounds,
Adjectives, Compounds, Possessives, Verbs, Texts, Notes
LEXICON
Nouns
agh
and (conjunction) (from Scandinavian og, och)
arg
virgin; derivations: argum (virginity,
purity, unspoiltness, worth), arag (adjective, “last”)
ash
one (counter number)
agd
sacrifice; derivations: agdum (the act of sacrifice), agdrarum (sacrifice
through action)
azg
ash tree; man, human; derivations: azgdrar
(warrior) (from Old Norse aske)
arzg
flyer, holder, frame
bal
flame (from Old Norse bal)
bazg
cover, fortifications
bil
wicked, wretched (adjective) (from OldNorse byl)
bizg
fish (from Proto-Indo-European pisk)
bulg
hide, skin
burz
dark (adjective)
dalg bed, drawer
dalg bed, drawer
damad depths; also see: infinity, the abyss, the void
darz dumb (adjective)
darz dumb (adjective)
dash tooth, teeth
dazg plain, also see: field
dirg flood
dizg plain
drag apparition; also see: specter (from Old
Norse draugr)
drar undertaking, duty, action
drar undertaking, duty, action
drum experience, also seen as dram (road, way of life,
experience)
duzg
sunset (from Proto-Indo-European dhuus, akin to English dusk)
gak
writing
gar
grass; derivations: gardizgir (“over the grassy plains”)
ghal skull
ghash fire
ghurz earth, ground, soil; derivations: ghurzum (the ground) (from Scandinavian jord)
ghal skull
ghash fire
ghurz earth, ground, soil; derivations: ghurzum (the ground) (from Scandinavian jord)
gul
spirit, wraith; derivations: nazgul (ring wraith) (from English ghoul, from Arabic gol)
hagd
witch, also see: seeress; derivations: hagdum (witchcraft, sorcery) (from Old Norse hag)
hagh
folk, race, breed, class, group
hastrum
star; derivations: hastrum sul (the sun) (from Proto-Indo-European hastra)
hazdrum something that burns, a burning thing
hugh thought, idea; derivations: husurz (intelligence) (from Old Norse hugin)
hur army (from Old Norse her)
hazdrum something that burns, a burning thing
hugh thought, idea; derivations: husurz (intelligence) (from Old Norse hugin)
hur army (from Old Norse her)
lath
roots, also see: dirt, group, crowd, that which grows up or surfaces;
lath
derivations: lathum (the public, the crowd) (from Proto-Indo-European leod)
lug
tower; derivations: lugburz (the black tower)
mal speech, language, word; derivations: malburz (the black speech) (from Old Norse maol)
man divine loyalty beyond all things, admiration, love
mar mara, a creature that rides on dreams; derivations: marum (nightmares)
mash mind, brain
mal speech, language, word; derivations: malburz (the black speech) (from Old Norse maol)
man divine loyalty beyond all things, admiration, love
mar mara, a creature that rides on dreams; derivations: marum (nightmares)
mash mind, brain
math mood, feeling, sentiment
mazgd
history, past, world, age, state of things, situation
mirz water
mun memory; derivations: munmirz (well of memory) (from Old Norse munin)
mirz water
mun memory; derivations: munmirz (well of memory) (from Old Norse munin)
nak
record; derivations: narnak (obituary)
nar
corpse
nazg ring, circle, cycle
nazg ring, circle, cycle
ragh
vassal, petty deity
rum room, space, layer, place;
rum room, space, layer, place;
rum derivations: surzrum (armory), thazgrum (headquarters) (from Old Norse raumr)
sabn
rest, repose; derivations: sabnum
(sleep)
sadur
beginning; seee also aragur
(end)
sash sense, senses
sind
elves (from Tolkein’s term “sindarin”)
sul sun
sul sun
surz
sharp; see also: fresh (adjective)
sut
hundred (counter number)
thazg objective, mission, order
thrazg trash, fodder
thazg objective, mission, order
thrazg trash, fodder
ugh
I, me (first person pronoun) (from Proto-Indo-European egh)
uk all (counter number); see also “Grammatical Endings: -uk”
ul him/them (in the accusitive case)
uk all (counter number); see also “Grammatical Endings: -uk”
ul him/them (in the accusitive case)
ur first, primal; derivations: uruk (the
first), urum (the highest)
urd
the wyrd, emperean, fate
Verbs
badat to see, also see: to read, to
watch, to intake
balgat to know
bimbat to wait, see also: to wait within
brakat to break, see also figuratively: to end something
bukat to awaken
brakat to break, see also figuratively: to end something
bukat to awaken
drahat to carry, bear
dralat to babble, chant, murmur
druhat to give birth to, to bear, to conceive
dralat to babble, chant, murmur
druhat to give birth to, to bear, to conceive
dumbat to house, contain, host;
derivations: dumbum (house)
durbat to rule
gadat to say, order, publish, approve
gadat to say, order, publish, approve
gimbat to
find
gimmat to entice or captivate
grakat to crack, split open
grakat to crack, split open
hasrat to go through, sift, filter
hazdrat to burn, give off light and heat
kimpat to lurk, see also: to lurk within
hazdrat to burn, give off light and heat
kimpat to lurk, see also: to lurk within
kragat to arrive
krimpat to bind
saghat to tell, narrate
saghat to tell, narrate
sakat to cut
simbat to sleep, sleep within
sughat to say or speak
surzat to sharpen, develop or improve
thrakat to bring (from Latin tracto)
thrazgat to struggle, endure or
persist
uzgat to use, employ; derivations:
uzgum (the use, usefullness)
Grammatical
Endings
-ab away from
-am at, by (indicating location)
-amb in the presence of, before, flanking
-ant before
-ar around
-at towards, at, to
-im belonging to
-ir over
-is in
-isi/ishi within
-uk adjectival marker, “-ic”
-unt under
-ur gerund marker, “-ing”; locative existential marker, “to be”;
-ur gerund marker, “-ing”; locative existential marker, “to be”;
-ur derivations: kur (where, which, what)
-us from
-us from
-um -ness or –ment, act of
Selected
Vocabulary
Planets
and Spiritual Beings
Nabash Neptune
Urash Uranus
Sadurash Saturn
Mard/Murd Mars
Inon/Bash Venus
Sadoth Mercury
Histron Hister
Hold Holdra, skogsrå, skogsfru
Mimon Mimir
An
explanation for the difference between many similarly translated words relating
to spirits:
We
have three words which mean similar things: drag, gul, and mar.
Drag generally refers to any
spectral being of a non-divine nature, usually a ghost or apparition, though
sometimes a demonic force or the envoy of such. A Drag is more likely to be
seen than interacted with.
Gul specifically refers to a being
that was once a mortal, akin to the English terms ghoul and wraith. They
usually have some kind of objective or are sent for something.
Mar specifically referrs to the
classical English “mare”.
PROCESS
Some
of the more obvious etymologies have been omitted from the lexicon above, such
as sul (sun). The following is a general overview of how the lexicon’s words
were constructed from Proto-Indo-European words and their derivations.
Through an analysis of the “canon”
words of the Black Speech found in Tolkein’s literature, the famous “Ring
Inscription”, in the vein of relating them to a theoretical Proto-Indo-European
origin, it will be explained how the rest of the lexicon was developed. This
primary analysis of the canon words gives a picture of the certain style and
patterns that the Black Speech adheres to, and which becomes a subset mutation
of Proto-Indo-European with rules. These rules most readily display the verity
of cognates between the Black Speech and Proto-Indo-European, and supply a
method from which further Proto-Indo-European words can be “mutated” into words
of the Black Speech.
Analysis
of the Canon
ash
– this counter number is translated in the canon as the equivalent of the
English term “one”. Using the theoretical existence of a Proto-Indo-European
suffix “-on” to which the English term “one” also belongs, ash becomes akin to this term. Therefore we have the construction
of “urash” (Uranus), meaning literally “first one”. Since it may also come from
a root appearing like “ans”, the Proto-Indo-European words possessing the “ans”
form such as “dash” (tooth) and “sash” (sense).
agh
- this conjunction linguistically resembles Scandinavian og, which
supports the idea of Norse influence. Therefore, a rule to derive words in the
Black Speech from Scandinavian ones follows the same sound change between Scandinavian
og and the Black Speech’s agh:
Scandinavian “o” becomes the Black
Speech’s “a”
Scandinavian “g” or “ch” becomes the
Black Speech’s “gh”
at
– this suffix also appeared in the Ring Inscription and is given the gloss of
“towards” or “at”, readily demonstrating its analogy with the Proto-Indo-European
suffix of the same nature (later becoming th Latin word ad and the English word at).
-uk
– this suffix is found in the canon word “Uruk-hai” and resembles the Proto-Indo-European suffix “ikos”, and
means the same thing. If “Ur” may mean the Proto-Indo-European term “ur”,
meaning “first” or “primordial”, then “Uruk-hai” would mean the race of the
first ones. This resembalance also provides a rule for the mutation of sounds:
Latin
“i” becomes the Black Speech’s “u”
Latin
“c” remains unchanged as the Black Speech’s “k”
thrakat – this verb appears in the Ring
Inscription and means “to bring”, and resembles the Proto-Indo-European word dhregh,
which also means “to bring” or “to drag” (later becoming the Latin word tracto and English
word drag), a fact which further establishes mutation laws:
Latin “t” and “tr” become the Black
Speech’s “th” and “thr”
Latin “ct” becomes the Black
Speech’s “k”
English “g” becomes the Black
Speech’s “k”
durbat – this verb also resembles a word from
a Proto-Indo-European language, the German word dürfen, which means “to be allowed” or “to be able to”, which is
similar to the meaning of “durbat” which is “to rule”. This supports an Indo-European influence, but
doesn’t allow for conclusive mutation rules. We know only that sounds like “f”
and “p” all become “b” in the Black Speech anyways.
burzum – this adjective meaning “dark” resembles
words that relate to being black or obscured, such as the Proto-Indo-European
word bhleg (later becoming the English words black, bleach).
Latin’s rule of turning Proto-Indo-European L’s into R’s and vice-versa may be
responsible for turning bhleg easily into brg,
which is not a long step away from brz
and burz.
Supplementation
of the Lexicon through Rules and Borrowings
Taking
the rules derived in the analysis of the word “agh”, we can conclude that the
counterpart of the Scandinavian first person pronoun “eg” would be “ugh”.
Therewith other personal pronouns can be developed:
mugh (me)
tugh (you)
(on and on and on…)
Certain
aspects of Norse culture that are invariably tied with the language were used
as well, such as the term “hagd” which comes from the Scandinavian word “hag”,
surviving also in modern day English as “hag”. The image of man as a tree has
not faded from human psychology – the term askr in Norse, denoting the ash
tree, became “azg” meaning both “ash” and “man”.
Through the same rules words like “dath”
and “lath” are taken from the Proto-Germanic words theudo and leudo, in turn coming
from Proto-Indo-European. Another portion of the lexicon comprises borrowings
for which no sound changes were readily applied, such as “rum” and “bal”.
Lastly words like duzg and bizg
came directly from Proto-Indo-European, taking the assumption that the “sk” sound would mutate into “zg”.
NOTES AND USAGE
Sounds
Although
the rest of the following sub-sections will be listed alphabetically, the
sounds of the sorcerous Black Speech will be explained first.
Several letters that are present in the
Latin alphabet are wholly missing in that of the Black Speech. In the canon
there was never any “e”, supposedly because the sound made one smile when it
was spoken, wrote Tolkein. The only “o” that is seen in the canon is in
Sauron’s name, and therefore a rule has been adopted that the letter “o” may
only appear in proper names of great beings, such as divinities or sovereigns,
and has since shown itself in a regular “on” suffix denoting such a being.
Alternatively, if “o” is undesireable to use, the letter “a” may be used
instead. Like “e”, the following letters are also entirely absent: c, f, j, p,
q, v, w, x, and y.
Sounds
that have a varying range of pronunciation throughout the Indo-European
languages, such as the pronunciation of “Parcifal” across Italy, Germany and
England, have no regular pronunciation and are quite free to follow the
ideosyncratic or ethnocentric tendancies of the speaker. For example, “z” may
be pronounced as a hard “s”, a soft “s”, or even “ts” like in German. Like
Latin, it has no uniform pronunciation in concern to these particular sounds.
This also includes the pronunciation of “r”.
The phoneme “gh” is a different
matter. It is a convention to write it this way; originally it was a simple “i”
such as in “Uruk-hai”, but I changed it due to lack of grace. It is pronounced
silently when between two vowels, but when it is the final sound in a word, it
is pronounced the same as the original “i”, rendering the spelling “Uruk-hagh”
the same as “Uruk-hai” in sound.
Adjectives
True
adjectives in the sorcerous Black Speech, such as surz and burz, are a
special class unto their own and do not function as simple compounds do. For
normal usage, the adjective takes the ending –uk and is applied to the front of a noun:
burzuk Lug (black tower)
For
definite nouns or proper names however, the adjective is attached to the back
of the noun:
Lugburz (the Black Tower)
Compounds
The
order of words in a compound word express definiteness. For definite
nouns, the descriptor is attached to the front of the noun:
Nazggul (Nazgul) (the ring wraith)
Arag-hagh (the race of the last
ones)
For
indefinite nouns the opposite is true, as the descriptor is attached to the end
of the noun:
Azgdrar (warrior)
Hastrum-sul (a star, in particular
the sun, indefinite in light of the existence of other suns)
Words
that denote things of which there are usually a lot, such as stars, drops,
records, books, etc. usually appear as the head (such as in the term hastrum
sul), while their descriptor follows. This is true without regard for
definiteness.
Possessives
The
ending -im is fixed to the end of the possessed noun, after which
follows the possessor which is undeclined, e.g. munim gurz - the earth's
memory, ghalim azg - the man's skull.
Some possessive relationships are
implied through wordage: the addition of “hagh” before a noun means “the
children of”, e.g. hai-sadurash (Saturn’s children)
Verbs
Temporal
tenses are never hinted at in the canon, therefore a simple rule concerning
suffixes has been applied to mark tense:
-i past tense
-ut future tense
Each
part of a declension is not necessary simultaneously. This means that the parts
can be added or omitted based on the speaker’s discretion, as is typical of an
agglutinative language. They follow this order:
verb – tense – miscellaneous endings –
person
e.g. Gimb-ut-ul-uk-ugh
(Find – will –
them – all – I)
I will find them
all
Personal
pronouns may be added to the end of a verb to denote person, but they may also
be featured as a separate word, e.g. Balgulugh and Ugh balgul.
Reflexive verbs like Simpat and Kimpat
may use –ul to denote the identical subject and object.
Texts
Example
Sentences
Kimpul
agh simpul hughrum-ishi, kur ghurzum-ishi nazg gimbutuk.
(They
lurk and sleep within the realm of thought, where the rings shall be found
interred.)
Narnakis
gimbiugh, lug dumbul ghalim sauron.
(I
found it in the obituary, the tower housing Sauron’s skull.)
Sut duzgburzunt ugh brakuluk durbumburzat.
(Under
a hundred black sunsets, I break them all for the Dark Kingdom)
Invocation
of the Knowledge of the Blood
Azgdrarim Histrona, drag damadus krimpughu agh gimmulughu
bukat urdis munhastrum gimbatul.
Uruk-hagh arag-hagh azgdrarim histron,
Mirzim mun thrakatul agh krimpul ghashim hugh.
Munmirzus ghalim mimon dral lurzurz damadburzus sagh:
Azgdrarim uruk-hagh azgdrarim arag-hagh
Translation:
Warriors
of Hister, the spectre from the deep I bind and bring I to awake and to find
the star-mind in Urd,
First
ones, last ones, warriors of Histron,
The
waters of the mind to bring and the fires of thought to bind.
Mimir’s
skull drawls from memory’s wells and from the void old knowledge tells,
Warriors
of the first ones, warriors of the last ones.
Notes
Many
would argue that the way to go about this is wrong here. I will not argue with
them except on the grounds that this reconstruction was not made for the
purpose of appeasing Tolkein fans, role-playing fans or anyone seeking a
reconstruction of how the Black Speech may have been in the exact legendarium
of Tolkein.
Quite on the contrary, the purpose
of the reconstruction as previously stated is the experimental extrapolation of
a likened language using Tolkein’s scant-supplied Black Speech as a basis, that
embodies the essence of a primordial and elemental nature whose analogy might
be found in Sauron or Morgoth in the legendarium.
Secondarily it was hoped that the
result could be used as a code or script for records, who none but those well
versed in the sorcerous Black Speech could read. I suppose this is partially the
ideal of every constructive linguist. It is recommended that the language be
written in a relatively Gothic hand, with letters more tall and orderly than
they are wide or round.
In closing, the ultimate ideal of
this work is to provide a language outside of the confines of the “angelic
tongues” of the Abrahamic religions that can be used for magic or ritual
purposes. These aforementioned tongues have persisted for millennia now as the
main evocative chants of the aspiring practitioner, thereby leading the said practitioner to eliciting the attention of only the angelic and demonic
hierarchies of Jehova, such as the ones listed in the Goetia. This pattern must
not keep up if the wider world of nature spirits, celestial spirits and other
non-Abrahamic gods are to still have a relation with humanity. This work
therefore aims to provide an entirely free method of magical and ritual
communication that is rooted in the psychological nature of the
Proto-Indo-European religion, and its subsequent forms in the latter
mythologies and pagan religions in pre-Christian Europe. This is by no means
the only method of achieving such a goal, but it aims to be an example of one.
Acknowledgments
I
would like to thank the webmistress Scatha and the website Land of Shadow for providing
analyses of the canon of the Black Speech and providing research material.
Likewise
I would like to thank the website The
Tongues of Arda for providing analyses of the canon of the Black
Speech, specifically in the area of the theory that the Black Speech was in
part derived from Hittite.
Lastly
I would like to thank Varg Vikernes for inspiring this effort in the first
place, and the idea that the Black Speech had roots in Old Norse and by
extension the Proto-Indo-European language.
The
following links go to articles that record the previous marks of progress in my
analysis of the Black Speech and its reconstruction:
The
following links go to other miscellaneous articles about the Black Speech in
general:
Mandatory Disclaimer: The Black Speech featured in
the “Lord of the Rings” and all related works by the Tolkien estate belong to
their respectful owners and I do not claim ownership of it, nor do I claim that
the Black Speech is my original idea. The work presented here is based on the
original idea by J.R.R. Tolkien and which is expanded on here for
non-commercial purposes.
No comments:
Post a Comment