I saw this while analyzing the construction of names in Latin, using titles and so forth:
Christus Rex Mundi
This name is a title, "Christ, King of the World". According to a theory which has arrived over several instances of like intuition, the declension of nouns is analogous to the conjugation of verbs. To demonstrate what I have found here, I must restyle the name to a form with analogous spelling. First "Rex" must originate back to "Rectus". Not only is this correct, but "rectus" also means "to rule", as a verb. Then we must replace the declension ending -us with "-i'" which I use. Therefore we get:
Christi' Recti' Mundi`
Words that end in the nominative -us get an apostrophe, while those that simply end as a genitive get the opposite. We see here that Christi' and Recti' are interchangeable, their placement trivial perhaps because they both indicate verbs. The name describes a being who "is annointed" (Christi') and "rules" (Recti'). However, we still have "Mundi`" here, and this is the object to which the action is done. It is therefore in the accusative case. What action is done to it? "Recti'" because it is transitive, and perhaps also because the placement places Recti' next to Mundi`. Therefore the name describes a being with two attributes, "Christi'" or having been anointed, and a being that rules the world, "Recti' Mundi`".
However, we see also in Latin, as well as in other PIE languages, that words can be combined, such as "crucificto" to cite a well-known example. How does this combination work? By attaching the object that receives the action to the front of the verb itself. Therefore, Recti' Mundi` could be re-stylized as Mundirecti'. Therefore:
Christi' Mundirecti'
Two verbs, two vowels, with an object for the second verb. Yet still both titles remain analogous to each other. I believe this is the primordial root and form to our Ursprache.
